From: Arthur “Brent” Porter · abporter@gmail.com
To: The Honorable John Cornyn, United States Senator (Texas)
Date: July 25, 2026
Re: Coerced medical evaluation, records obstruction, OCR closeout; Blanche AG conflict; meeting requested
Dear Senator Cornyn:
I am a Texan—College Station roots. I have never voted Democrat; the last president I voted for was G.W. Bush; I am independent now and have not yet found a candidate I would vote for and have the health to vote for. I write with a documented file. Package: OCR briefing, harm of the process, full case.
What happened. Under family financial pressure I was pushed into a comprehensive evaluation at UT Dell Medical School / UT Health Austin Psychiatry (December 2024)—involuntary / coerced consent, not free choice. Under infection, mold context, and that pressure I still scored in the 97th percentile of abstract/perceptual reasoning. I supplied extensive material in good faith: 156 outbound emails to UT Austin / UT System after Nov 1, 2024 (local export). HIM later said certain emails were not in the chart; family-side messages indicate relevant communications were sent.
OCR. Rights language included that a complaint can be “an integral part of OCR’s enforcement efforts.” Later: OCR “will not investigate,” closed with no further action. Deeds over words.
Harm of the process. Spasms during and after this season are on camera (see harm page). CRF/stress literature is context; the body and the file are exhibits.
Conflict of interest—no tutorial required. A president’s personal criminal-defense counsel as Attorney General is structural capture: the board that indemnifies a CEO and installs his private lawyer as general counsel. Senator Grassley built a brand on the False Claims Act and as a protector of whistleblowers. He once pressed hard on Nemeroff-style conflicts of interest in medicine. In the July 2026 Blanche confirmation process his prepared opening said early: “Congratulations on your nomination, Mr. Blanche.” When former career Pardon Attorney Elizabeth Oyer stated Blanche fired her after she refused to rubber-stamp gun-rights restoration for a friend of the President (public reporting: Mel Gibson), committee Republicans—including the chair’s side of the hearing—worked to discredit her rather than protect a whistleblower narrative, and largely avoided using her account to test Blanche. The anti-fraud brand and that posture do not cohere.
If a man is not fit for the office of the presidency, leaving him in place multiplies error—including war, money, and lives—and elevating his personal lawyer multiplies how hard accountability becomes. Madison and Mason assumed Congress would check abuse of the pardon power in the worst political cases. Day-one mass clemency for January 6 defendants happened; removal did not. That is not only constitutional irony. It is who is doing the catering.
Asks: (1) Constituent meeting or staff briefing within 30 days. (2) Written inquiry to HHS/OCR and/or UT Health Austin on the records/OCR trail. (3) Do not rubber-stamp an Attorney General who is the president’s personal defense counsel.
I am making a film about my case, my nation, and what officials did when the file was in front of them. That is not revenge and not a threat. It is a promise to the record: I will name what I see. Officials write the plot with every choice; they decide how they will be seen—ironic or heroic. Right now I do not see heroism. I see a Texas file closed in silence and a party protecting a man over the hard duties of the Constitution. Davy Crockett refused to be any man’s dog. I would rather the record show senators who still knew what that meant.
Respectfully,
Arthur “Brent” Porter
Texas constituent